The Linux Foundation Projects
Skip to main content

Definition

The hardware namespace supports the detailed definition of physical and virtual hardware representation systems. The hardware supply chain supports the supply chain detail based on component level and component decomposition.

Personas

This profile may be produced or consumed by a variety of personas, including:

  • Software Developers: They use the information to understand how software is executed on hardware dependencies.
  • Security Analysts:  They can leverage this data for vulnerability analysis and risk assessment.
  • Compliance Officers: This helps them demonstrate compliance with regulations that require supply chain transparency (e.g., GDPR, NIST).
  • Procurement Managers: They use it to understand the components in a system before purchasing or renewing licenses.
  • IT Administrators:  They can leverage this information for inventory management and asset tracking purposes.

Use Cases

System Auditing

A Hardware Bill of Materials (HBOM) is a comprehensive, structured inventory that lists all components, libraries, modules, and dependencies—both direct and indirect—that make up a hardware and software application. This “list of ingredients” includes open-source and third-party modules, their versions, licenses, and other relevant metadata.

SPDX supports the collection the collection of information required for comprehensive system auditing to help you answers questions such as:

  1. Is this system (computer and software) the one I ordered? Does it have all the correct components?  
  2. What is installed? Do all the components adhere to your policies and is it operating as expected?
  3. Can you create an amalgamated inventory of all the computers, software, connections and containers within your environment?
  4. Can you document all components with a computer including hardware and software trees with relationships?
    1. Can you save the information related to hardware, software, connections, AI, licences, so the information can be shared internally or externally?
  5. How do you interlink records and enhance or enrich records with 3rd party data sets?
  6. Can you analyze your data to identify vulnerabilities and threats?

Anti-Counterfeit Tracking for Semiconductors

Problem: The rise in counterfeit or cloned chips, especially during shortages.
Use Case:

  • Semiconductor fabs serialize each chip with a unique ID.
  • ID is recorded in a blockchain-based ledger.
  • Every actor in the supply chain (distributor, OEM, integrator) scans the chip during transfers.
  • At deployment (e.g., military, telecom), the chip is re-verified against the blockchain ledger.
  • Shipment detail tracking supports accountability to mitigate the introduction of counterfeit products.

Benefit: Guarantees the authenticity and source of the chip. Prevents High-Security Hardware for Government or Defense Contracts, trojans, and clone components.

High-Security Hardware for Government or Defense Contracts

Problem: Government systems must be secure and tamper-free.
Use Case:

  • Trusted hardware manufacturers use tamper-evident seals and log custody from fab to integrator.
  • All hardware is scanned into a digital CoC system, including physical location, date, and authorized personnel.
  • Delivery includes verification logs and secure acceptance protocol.

Benefit: Prevents hardware backdoors or supply chain interdiction; supports FISMA and FedRAMP requirements.

Lifecycle Verification for Secure Boot Chips

Problem: Firmware-level threats are increasingly common in secure boot or TPM modules.

Use Case:

  • Secure element manufacturers issue cryptographic attestations of firmware state.
  • Every custody handoff (assembly, integration, OS loading) is recorded and checked.
  • Upon boot, the system verifies the CoC hash chain before initializing the chip.

Benefit: Detects tampering between fabrication and deployment. Supports Zero Trust architectures.

OEM Warranty Validation and Recall Management

Problem: Difficulty tracking faulty hardware batches or validating warranty claims.

Use Case:

  • Each device is registered with batch number and component IDs.
  • Field failures are reported against that registry.
  • OEMs trigger targeted recalls and notify affected customers through serial mapping.

Benefit: Faster and more accurate hardware recalls; reduced fraud in warranty claims.

Benefits

The key benefit is having a common set of classes, properties and vocabularies provides a common “language” for communicating Hardware Bill of Materials (and any related SPDX profile) concepts between producer and consumers. A full product stack can now be used to represent organization operational needs while mitigating risk more accurately.  The Hardware profile also eases the burden for development of tools that utilize or extend the SPDX 3.1 specification.

Related Content

The following is a list of related profiles supported by the hardware and software tree built into SPDX V3.1.

  • Core
  • Software
  • Hardware
  • Supply Chain
  • Licensing
  • Services
  • Operations
  • AI
  • Dataset
  • Security
  • Cryptology
  • Safety
  • Threat Modeling and Controls